What Kinds of Lies Are Trump Articulating?

Literature

The coronavirus pandemic is dramatically disrupting not only our daily lives but society itself. This show features conversations with some of the world’s leading thinkers and writers about the deeper economic, political, and technological consequences of the pandemic. It’s our new daily podcast trying to make longterm sense out of the chaos of today’s global crisis.

On today’s episode, Federico Finchelstein, professor of history at the New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College and author of A Brief History of Fascist Lies, discusses whether there is something particularly fascist about the untruths that Donald Trump is now articulating.

From the episode:

Article continues after advertisement

Federico Finchelstein: Trump is getting closer to Fascism. He’s not a fascist yet. Broadly, he would like to be, and I think it depends on the rest of us, people who believe in democracy to basically resist these attacks against democracy.

Now, I would say this: this type of line belongs to the history of Fascism. In that sense, Trump is really close to Fascism in the way fascist not only spread propaganda but also believe in their lies. They automatically believe that their form of politics is a kind of religion in which there is a cult-like situation and the leader is like a god. In that sense, the way Trump is lying, yes, it belongs to the history of Fascism because he shares certain patterns that would align him with Fascism.

Andrew Keen: In your book, you acknowledge that most politicians tell lies. It’s almost part of the job description, but there’s something unique about fascists lies. What is it? You suggested earlier that they believe these lies, but these lies themselves are what you call in your book “Transcendence of Reason.” Is that fair?

Federico Finchelstein: Yes, because when typical politicians are lying, they know they are lying and they know that because what they are saying doesn’t correspond to, let’s say, reality or to empirical observation. With us, this situation is different for the fascists. For them, it is empirical observation that is wrong because the truth, as they see, relates to a faith in the word of the leader.

Subscribe now on iTunes, Spotify, Stitcher, or wherever else you find your podcasts!

Article continues after advertisement

________________________________

Federico Finchelstein is Professor of History at the New School for Social Research and Eugene Lang College in New York City. He is the author of several books, including From Fascism to Populism in History, Transatlantic Fascism, and The Ideological Origins of the Dirty War. His books have been translated into many languages, including Spanish, Portuguese, Turkish, and Italian. He contributes to major American, European, and Latin American media, including the New York Times, the Washington Post, the Guardian, CNN, Foreign Policy, Clarín, Corriere della Sera, Nexos, and Folha de S.Paulo.



Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

A Summary and Analysis of Sandra Cisneros’ ‘Salvador Late or Early’
Zelda Fitzgerald: Writer, Muse, and… Painter?
Boost Your Photography Game Affordably With MPB’s Outstanding Range Of Used Kit
‘Power Rangers’ Star Jason David Frank Struggled with Mental Health, Friend Says
Jay Leno Cruising in Vintage Bentley and Back Onstage at Comedy Club

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.